Complex rules, clearly seen.

The EU high-risk third country list

Every amendment to the Annex to Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2016/1675 since it was made in July 2016. For each amendment, the countries added, the countries removed and the date the change took effect. Obliged entities must apply enhanced due diligence to business relationships and transactions involving a listed country.

delegated regulations in force since 2016, thirteen of which changed the list itself. A sixteenth, adopted in March 2024, never entered into force.

countries and territories currently listed across the four points of the Annex.

1

amendment blocked by the European Parliament, which delayed seven changes by fourteen months.

What replaces this on 10 July 2027

Everything above rests on Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2016/1675, which is made under Article 9(2) of Directive (EU) 2015/849. Article 77 of Directive (EU) 2024/1640 repeals that Directive with effect from 10 July 2027. What happens to the Annex then is discussed at Tracker item 35.

Regulation (EU) 2024/1624 puts the architecture in three articles instead of one. Article 29 identifies third countries with significant strategic deficiencies and designates them high-risk third countries. The criteria in Article 29(2) include deficiencies of a persistent nature that no measures have been taken, or are being taken, to mitigate. The whole of the enhanced due diligence list in Article 34(4) applies. The delegated act also names specific countermeasures from Article 35. Article 30 identifies third countries with compliance weaknesses, taking as its baseline information on jurisdictions under increased monitoring by international standard setters, and here the delegated act names which of the Article 34(4) measures apply rather than all of them. Both are adopted by delegated act within 20 calendar days of the Commission ascertaining that the criteria are met.

Article 31 is the one with no counterpart in the FATF lists. It lets the Commission identify, in exceptional cases, a third country posing a specific and serious threat to the Union’s financial system where that threat cannot be mitigated under Articles 29 and 30. Which measures follow depends on what the threat amounts to: countermeasures where it amounts to a significant strategic deficiency, specified enhanced due diligence where it amounts to a compliance weakness.

For a firm the practical change is that the question stops being whether a country is listed and becomes which article it is listed under, because the article decides whether every enhanced measure applies or only the ones named in the act. What has not been published is the implementing act allowed by Article 31(9), which would set the methodology for identification under that article and the process for involving Member States and AMLA.

The list as it stands

Every amendment, in order of effect

ActDatesAddedRemovedDetail

Abbreviations

AML/CFT
anti-money laundering and countering the financing of terrorism: the two duties this body of law almost always imposes together
AMLA
the EU Authority for Anti-Money Laundering and Countering the Financing of Terrorism, seated in Frankfurt. It will directly supervise a small number of high-risk cross-border firms, coordinate national supervisors, and it drafts most of the technical standards tracked on these pages
FATF
Financial Action Task Force, the global standard-setter. Its Recommendations are not law, but EU law is built to implement them and its listing decisions drive the EU high-risk list
OJ
Official Journal of the European Union. An act becomes law only on publication there, and its dates run from that publication
DEA
delegated act: a Commission act made under power conferred by a parent law. Parliament and Council may block it but cannot amend it

A published reference, not advice to any particular firm; reading it creates no professional relationship.
Enquiries: office@theamlmonitor.eu · Legal notice · Privacy · Terms