Complex rules, clearly seen.

Regulatory tracker

Commission initiatives and AMLA single-rulebook and supervisory mandates, mapped to the FATF Recommendations. Classification is an analytical mapping, not an official FATF or Commission one.

How to read this page

Regulation or Directive – check this first

A Regulation applies directly and identically in every Member State on the date it gives; no national law stands between it and your firm. A Directive binds Member States to a result but must first be written into twenty-seven national laws, so its deadline binds governments, not your firm directly – and in practice the national texts arrive at different speeds and in different words. AMLR is a Regulation. AMLD6 is a Directive.

The six sections are stages, not topics

An item sits in the section matching how far it has travelled, and moves as it progresses. So the same subject can appear in a different section next month without anything about it having changed except its status.

  1. Completed – adopted, published or delivered.
  2. Finalised by AMLA, awaiting the Commission – the draft standard is done; the Commission has not yet adopted it. Dates here are estimated from the legal timetable.
  3. Next steps with an announced date – a date exists and has been stated.
  4. In the legislative procedure – moving through Parliament and Council, end date unknown.
  5. AMLA mandates in development – work AMLA owes, with no delivery date announced.
  6. Closed – withdrawn or abandoned, kept so the record is complete.

“In force” is not “applies”

An act enters into force a few days after publication in the Official Journal: that is when it legally exists. The day it starts to bite can be years later. Each item’s status gives whichever date you can plan against and says which one it is.

Direct and supporting relevance

Every item is mapped to the FATF Recommendations it touches. Direct means the item is the measure that implements the Recommendation; supporting or indirect means it helps without being that measure. This mapping is analytical, made for this page. It is not an official FATF or Commission classification, and should not be quoted as one.

Item numbers and the controls

Numbers are permanent and do not run in document order – an item keeps its number when it moves between sections, so a reference stays valid. The timeline cites these same numbers. Search covers titles, bodies and article references; AMLA narrows to AMLA’s own mandates; Direct relevance hides supporting items; Expand all opens every item at once.

Abbreviations

AML/CFT
anti-money laundering and countering the financing of terrorism – the two duties this body of law almost always imposes together
AMLA
the EU Authority for Anti-Money Laundering and Countering the Financing of Terrorism, seated in Frankfurt. It will directly supervise a small number of high-risk cross-border firms, coordinate national supervisors, and it drafts most of the technical standards tracked on these pages
AMLAR
Regulation (EU) 2024/1620, which establishes AMLA and sets out its powers
AMLR
Regulation (EU) 2024/1624, the Anti-Money Laundering Regulation. Being a Regulation it applies directly in every Member State from 10 July 2027, with no national law in between
AMLD6
Directive (EU) 2024/1640, the sixth Anti-Money Laundering Directive. Being a Directive it must be written into each Member State’s own law, by 10 July 2027
AMLD4
Directive (EU) 2015/849, the fourth Anti-Money Laundering Directive – the framework in force today, repealed with effect from 10 July 2027
FATF
Financial Action Task Force, the global standard-setter. Its Recommendations are not law, but EU law is built to implement them and its listing decisions drive the EU high-risk list
RTS
regulatory technical standards: binding detail drafted by an authority such as AMLA or the EBA and adopted by the Commission
ITS
implementing technical standards: binding detail adopted by the Commission, usually forms, formats and procedures rather than substance
PEPs
politically exposed persons – people entrusted with prominent public functions, who must be subject to enhanced scrutiny
DNFBPs
designated non-financial businesses and professions – lawyers, notaries, accountants, estate agents, dealers in high-value goods and similar, who carry AML duties despite not being financial institutions
CASPs
crypto-asset service providers – firms authorised under MiCA, which EU law also treats as obliged entities for AML purposes
VASPs
virtual asset service providers – the FATF term for what EU law calls crypto-asset service providers
MiCA
Regulation (EU) 2023/1114 on markets in crypto-assets, which created the EU authorisation regime for crypto firms
FIU
financial intelligence unit – the national body that receives suspicious transaction reports and passes intelligence to law enforcement
EPPO
European Public Prosecutor’s Office, which investigates and prosecutes crimes against the EU budget
OLAF
the European Anti-Fraud Office, which investigates fraud against the EU budget
EBA
European Banking Authority, which wrote the EU’s AML technical standards before AMLA existed and still holds some mandates
ESMA
European Securities and Markets Authority, the EU-level supervisor for securities and crypto-asset markets
EDPS
European Data Protection Supervisor, which oversees how EU institutions handle personal data and is consulted on AML files
EUDPR
Regulation (EU) 2018/1725, the data protection rules that bind the EU’s own institutions and bodies
MLA
mutual legal assistance – the formal route by which one state asks another for evidence or enforcement
OJ
Official Journal of the European Union. An act becomes law only on publication there, and its dates run from that publication
PSD3
the proposed third Payment Services Directive, still in the legislative procedure
PSR
the proposed Payment Services Regulation, still in the legislative procedure
CETS
Council of Europe Treaty Series, the numbering used for Council of Europe conventions. These are separate from EU law and bind only the states that ratify them
COD
ordinary legislative procedure, in a procedure file reference: Parliament and Council must both agree before an act can pass
CNS
consultation procedure, in a procedure file reference: the Council decides after consulting Parliament, which cannot veto

A published reference, not advice to any particular firm; reading it creates no professional relationship.
Enquiries: office@theamlmonitor.eu · Legal notice · Privacy · Terms